• Users Online: 8304
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 65  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 108-114  

Implementation and adherence to a speciality-specific checklist for neurosurgery and its influence on patient safety


1 Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

Date of Submission13-May-2020
Date of Decision29-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance23-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication10-Feb-2021

Correspondence Address:
Varun Suresh
Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram - 695 011, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_419_20

Rights and Permissions
 


Background and Aims: Neurosurgery involves a high level of expertise coupled with enduring and long duration of working hours. There is a paucity of published literature about the experience with a speciality-specific checklist in neurosurgery. We conducted a cross-sectional observational study to identify the adherence to various elements of the Modified World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) for neurosurgery by the operating room (OR) team. Methods: We implemented an intra-operative Modified WHO SSC consisting of 40 tools for neurosurgery, in 200 consecutive elective cases. Trained anaesthesiologists assumed the role of checklist co-ordinator. The checklist divided the surgery into 5 phases, each corresponding to a specific time-period. The adherence rates to various tools were evaluated and areas where the checklist prompted a corrective measure were analysed. Results: A total of 131 cases undergoing craniotomy and 69 cases undergoing spine surgery were studied. With the 40-point modified SSC applied in 200 cases, we analysed a total of 8000 observations. The modified checklist prompted the OR team to adhere to speciality-specific safety practices about application of compression stockings (9.5%); airway precautions in unstable cervical spine (2.5%); precautions for treatment of raised intracranial pressure (10.5%); and intraoperative neuro-monitoring (5%). Conclusion: The implementation of Modified WHO SSC for Neurosurgery, by a designated checklist co-ordinator, can rectify anaesthetic and surgical facets promptly, without increasing the OR time. The anaesthesiologist as SSC coordinator can effectively implement an intraoperative checklist ensuring excellent participation of operating room team members.

Keywords: Checklist, neurosurgery, perioperative care


How to cite this article:
Suresh V, Ushakumari P R, Pillai C M, Kutty RK, Prabhakar RB, Peethambaran A. Implementation and adherence to a speciality-specific checklist for neurosurgery and its influence on patient safety. Indian J Anaesth 2021;65:108-14

How to cite this URL:
Suresh V, Ushakumari P R, Pillai C M, Kutty RK, Prabhakar RB, Peethambaran A. Implementation and adherence to a speciality-specific checklist for neurosurgery and its influence on patient safety. Indian J Anaesth [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 24];65:108-14. Available from: https://www.ijaweb.org/text.asp?2021/65/2/108/309096




   Introduction Top


Surgical procedures play an important role as a treatment modality for many common diseases alleviating the human suffering with millions of surgical procedures performed the world-over every year. After major surgery, there is a reported crude mortality rate in the range of 0.5–5%[1] with at least 50% of the total in-hospital adverse events attributed to surgical care.[2] Many of the surgical complications are due to preventable or modifiable causes.[3] Checklists are a common tool to prevent human errors and facilitate mandatory inspection of the equipment in complex and high-intensity work environments. The 'Safe Surgery Saves Lives' global campaigns in 2007 by the World Health Organization (WHO) lead to the demonstration of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in the operating room (OR), in significantly reducing mortality and adverse events.[4] The WHO SSC though comprehensive, is envisaged to cover all the surgical sub-specialities. Hence, WHO encourages that each speciality can use modified SSC specific to their requirements complying with certain mandatory protocols.[5]

Neurosurgical practice requires a high expertise, enduring and long working hours, with no scope for inadvertent errors. Ever since the implementation of the WHO SSC, vast progress has been made in surgical neurosciences that mandates specific intra-operative essentials not required in other surgical sub-specialities. The global experience with a speciality-specific checklist in neurosurgery is limited.[6] In this context, we conducted the present study implementing a Modified WHO SSC for neurosurgery in our centre. The primary aim of this study was to identify the adherence to various elements of the Modified WHO SSC for neurosurgery by the perioperative care team. The secondary aims were to evaluate how a mandatory speciality-specific checklist implementation practice can help in early identification of those therapeutic aspects that are pertinent and specific to neurosurgery, which can otherwise be missed.


   Methods Top


After obtaining Institutional Ethics Committee approval, we conducted a cross-sectional observational study to evaluate the adherence to various elements of the Modified WHO SSC for neurosurgical procedures by our OR team. The study was conducted from January 2020 to April 2020. Informed written consent was obtained from participating patients. The study was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India vide CTRI/2020/01/022861. The study was conducted in the neurosurgical ORs of our institution. There are two dedicated neurosurgical theatres in our institution operating 2-4 elective cases a day on an average.

We selected a total of 200 consecutive patients undergoing nerosurgery for the study. The observed cases formed a sample of patients undergoing cranial or spinal surgery for their primary disease. The nursing personnel follow a written pre-operative checklist in our institution [Table 1]. The standard WHO SSC was implemented in our institution since 2015 and has been followed in all surgical cases.
Table 1: Preoperative preparation checklist for the Neurosurgical patient (To be filled by the nursing personnel in patient care ward before transferring the patient to operating room)

Click here to view


The WHO SSC is a 19-item tool addressing issues pertinent to intraoperative care.[4] We retained all the 19 items of WHO SSC and with further additions to suit the requirements for neurosurgical procedures, developed a modified 40-item SSC [Table as Supplement to text]. Appraisals and inputs from neurosurgeons, anaesthesiologists and nursing personnel of the neurosurgical OR were carefully considered to develop the modified SSC. This modified WHO SSC was implemented in 200 consecutive elective cases undergoing neurosurgery in the ORs of our hospital.



The anaesthesiologist attending the patient assumed the role of checklist co-ordinator in our study. The co-ordinators were provided with a printed checklist for each patient. The checklist coordinators were trained about the revised checklist and its implementation before initiation of the study by the investigators. Education on the exact timing of implementation of sub-components of the checklist was also part of this training module. Before starting data collection in the OR, consistent inter-rater reliability between checklist coordinators and study investigators was ensured through multiple pre-planned training sessions. Discrepancies during the training period were discussed in detail and standard interpretation of checklist definitions was explained to the coordinators.

The checklist divides the surgical procedure into 5 phases, each corresponding to a specific time-period in the normal flow of a procedure. The list started with a briefing followed by the period, prior to induction of anaesthesia - Sign In. 'Sign in' domain was completed prior to any drug injection/intervention inside the OR. 'Time Out' was the period after induction and before surgical incision; 'Sign Out' corresponded to the period during or immediately after wound closure, with the senior operating surgeon still present in the OR. This was followed by a debriefing which constituted the fifth and final step of checklist implementation. The respective operative team recapitulated pertinent intraoperative information of the patient and communicated necessary postoperative plans during the debriefing phase. The study investigators kept thorough overall surveillance daily of the new checklist performance. The checklist co-ordinator orally confirmed the completion of the basic steps for ensuring effective teamwork, safe anaesthesia, antibiotic prophylaxis against infection and other inherent routines in surgery. In each phase, the checklist coordinator confirmed that the surgical team had completed the tasks in the SSC as the surgery proceeds onwards. Each task in our printed checklist was to be marked either concordant or discordant by the co-ordinator. Tasks where the checklist prompted a corrective initiative were marked discordant and corrective initiative was initiated as required.

A major goal of checklist implementation is to ensure reasonable communication among OR team members. For this, the checklist co-ordinators recorded participation level of team members as excellent, good and poor (Excellent – all team members participated, good – one team member did not participate and poor when ≥2 team members did not participate). Further distraction levels during checklist conduct was recorded as minimal (non-team member was entering the OR); moderate (non-team member was entering the OR and any team member not attending to checklist questions); and maximum (non-team member was entering the OR, any team member not attending to checklist questions and any team member answering a phone call during checklist implementation). The time required to complete each phase of the modified WHO SSC was also recorded.

Data collected in a prescribed proforma was entered into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analysed. The adherence rates to various components were evaluated as percentages. Areas where the checklist prompted a corrective measure were considered as scope for further improvement in the OR work pattern. The distraction levels and participation levels were also evaluated as percentages. A descriptive analysis of various challenges faced during checklist administration was also done.


   Results Top


The patient and surgical case characteristics of the study population are described in [Table 2]. A total of 131 cases undergoing craniotomy and 69 cases undergoing spine surgery were studied. The performance of the modified SSC was 100% among the checklist co-ordinators. With the 40-point modified SSC applied in 200 cases, we analysed a total of 8000 observations.
Table 2: Patient and surgical case characteristics

Click here to view


No major intraoperative errors were noted during the study period. The concordance to sign-in phase of the checklist and areas where the checklist prompted a corrective initiative are described in [Table 3]. Compression stockings were not present in 19 (9.5%) cases, wherein the checklist prompted application of stockings/pneumatic compression devices. Operative site was not marked in 9 cases. Out of these, 8 cases had a cranial bone defect and were scheduled for cranioplasty with evident operative site on inspection. Twenty-nine patients did not require two large bore intravenous cannulae or central venous cannula in view of lesser anticipated intraoperative blood loss. Nineteen patients (9.5%) of the 24 (12%) cases undergoing cervical spine instrumentation required advanced airway adjuncts due to unstable spine. The SSC prompted timely mobilisation of advanced airway carts with video-laryngoscope/bronchoscope for 5 of these cases. Patient allergy to phenytoin sodium in 4 (2%) cases was revealed to all team members after applying the checklist. The checklist prompted the application of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) for maintenance in 21 (10.5%) cases with raised intracranial pressure. The checklist prompted modifying anaesthesia protocol by avoiding skeletal muscle relaxants, using low alveolar concentration of inhaled anaesthetics and/or preparation for burst suppression in 10 (5%) of the 76 (38%) cases where neuro-monitoring was used. The checklist prompted timely procurement of ultrasonic dissectors/bone drills/bone-wax/haemostatic agents in 21 (10.5%) cases.
Table 3: Sign-in tools of the Modified WHO SSC for Neurosurgery (Total n=200)

Click here to view


The concordance to the time-out and sign-out phases of the checklist and areas where the checklist prompted a corrective initiative are as described in [Table 4]. Forced air warmer was applied after a checklist prompt in 17 (8.5%) cases. Intraoperative point of care investigations were prompted by the SSC for 19 (9.5%) cases which included an arterial blood gas analysis for 11 cases and serial blood sugar estimation for 8 cases. Twenty-nine (14.5%) study cases required postoperative mechanical ventilation. The SSC prompted early arrangement of required intensive care unit facilities for 7 (3.5%) of these cases.
Table 4: Time-out and Sign-out tools of the Modified WHO SSC for Neurosurgery (Total n=200)

Click here to view


The time required for completion of sign-in phase of the checklist was 132 ± 11 seconds. The time-out and sign-out phases of the checklist were completed in 91 ± 09 seconds and 62 ± 08 seconds, respectively. The team member's participation reported by checklist co-ordinators was as follows- Excellent 80.5%; good 17.5%; and poor 2%. Distraction levels during checklist conduct were as minimal in 85.5%; moderate in 13%; and maximum in 1.5% of the cases.


   Discussion Top


The implementation of a 40-tool modified checklist co-ordinated by the anaesthesiologist found the pragmatic challenges that underlie the meticulous conduct of neurosurgical procedures. Our Modified WHO SSC is unique with all tools linked to specific unambiguous action and it meets all the underlying intraoperative concerns of speciality-specific patient care that is pertinent to neurosurgery. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first study from the developing world to evaluate the implementation of a modified speciality-specific checklist in lines with the time-tested WHO SSC. Our novel effort assures that specialty-specific checklists are feasible and can be completed in a short time frame with the OR team members not loosing attention. It further reiterates that focussed training and teamwork shall ensure conscientious implementation of a SSC, rather than this becoming a mere 'tick-box' exercise.

To date, the world neurosurgical experience with checklists is quite limited[7] compared to other areas of surgery.[8],[9] The vast progress and increase in neurosurgical procedures in the last decade necessitates the need to initiate a speciality-specific SSC.[10] Moreover, the aim of the original WHO SSC is not to prescribe a single universal approach, but to ensure that essential safety elements are incorporated into the OR routine.[5]

In our study, we used a paper checklist for each case instead of a poster checklist. Poster placements are limited by free-wall space, fixed font-size and unavailability if placed on mobile machinery. Such situations can warrant reliance on the co-ordinators' memory to perform the checklist tools, which can easily lead to missed items that can jeopardise patient safety.

Jelacic et al.[11] evaluated the effect of an aviation-style computerised SSC on checklist performance in general surgery and gynaecologic procedures. The authors found that total checklist completion rates with the computerised version were 86.3% compared to 2.1% for a poster version. The authors observed that there is a dramatic difference between observed checklist completion rates and documented checklist completion rates in real-life practice as also inferred by Mahmood et al.[12] and suggested the computerised SSC as an option in attaining better checklist completion rates. However, implementing a computerised SSC is resource intense, expensive and requires appropriate training to apply in low-income countries.

The trained OR anaesthesiologist assumed the role of checklist co-ordinator in our study. Evidence from previous studies indicates that such migrated leadership can improve team engagement and compliance with administering the checklist.[13] Personnel attitudes like denial, lack of engagement, hierarchy in the OR discouraging an open communication and embarrassment about introductions are barriers to implementing a checklist in the OR. Trained checklist co-ordinators who run the checklist at appropriate time frames considerably reduce this ambiguity.

We found a complete concordance to many tools in our modified checklist that were simultaneously present also in the nursing personnel pre-operative checklist [Table 1]. We infer that these 'double checks' in two different areas, the preoperative ward and OR, has unparalleled importance in ensuring perioperative patient safety in neurosurgery.

The implementation of the modified checklist in our study facilitated focussed actions pertinent to patient concerns specific for neurosurgery such as mechanical deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis; use of advanced airway aids for unstable cervical spine;[14] prevention of hypersensitivity/anaphylaxis to phenytoin;[15] use of osmotherapy and/or total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) for raised ICP; targeted anaesthetic titration for intraoperative neuromonitoring;[16],[17] and point-of-care blood-gas analysis [Table 3] and [Table 4]. This attains further relevance in the context when neurosurgical cases are done by non-neuroanaesthesiologists.

The rather low concordance to self-introduction of all team members in our study needs to be viewed with compassion. Unfamiliarity with OR workflow and embarrassment of trainee resident doctors/nurses could have contributed to this. Implementing the modified checklist facilitated self-introductions among all the team members thereby inculcating greater communication and work involvement of all team members.

Till date, very few studies have examined the role of a safety checklist in neurosurgery.[6],[7] Westman M et al.[18] in their systematic review on SSC use and its impact on patient safety analysed 29,717 neurosurgical patients across 13 observational studies and 1 randomised controlled trial. However, majority of these studies were protocol driven 'bundles-of-care' wherein multiple interventions in the treatment protocol had influenced outcome rather than the SSC alone. It was observed that practice of such 'bundles-of-care' can reduce infection rates, postoperative complications and unforeseen reoperations/readmissions in posterior spinal-fusion surgeries,[19],[20] paediatric and adult ventriculo-peritoneal shunts,[21],[22] external ventricular drain procedures,[23],[24] and ventriculostomy.[25]

Earliest experience with a checklist in neurosurgery is an 8-item simple checklist introduced by Lyons et al.[26] Lepanluoma et al.[27] found in their retrospective study that the implementation of standard WHO SSC in neurosurgery was associated with a decrease in complication-related neurosurgical reoperations from 3.3% to 2.0%. Oszvald et al.[28] found no error in operative-site in a series of 3595 neurosurgical procedures in their institution after implementation of WHO SSC. Fargen et al.[29] observed that use of WHO SSC in neuro-interventions improves team communications. Using the WHO SCC, Haugen et al.[30] found that complication rates decreased from 19.9% to 11.5%; mean length of stay decreased by 0.8 days; and in-hospital mortality decreased from 1.9% to 0.2% (P < 0.001) in their series of patients undergoing cardiovascular/neurologic/urologic/orthopaedic/general surgery.

Our study has a few limitations. We did not perform a pre-post evaluation on measurable outcome variables like mortality, surgical site infections, unplanned reoperations and length of hospital stay. Our checklist may not be applicable for certain neurosurgical procedures like deep brain stimulator placements, robotic neurosurgery and neuro-radiologic interventions.


   Conclusion Top


The implementation of a speciality-specific neurosurgical checklist by a designated checklist co-ordinator can rectify in time anaesthetic and surgical facets without increasing the OR time. The anaesthesiologist as SSC coordinator can ensure excellent participation of OR team members during the checklist implementation. The modified SSC also improves communication among the team members and results in a smooth workflow in the neurosurgical OR.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Research Grant No. A2/(SBMR.2019-2020)/34239/2019/MCT dated 07.12.2019 of State Board of Medical Research, Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Kerala, India.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C, et al. Mortality after surgery in Europe: A 7 day cohort study. Lancet 2012;380:1059-65.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Miskovic A, Lumb AB. Postoperative pulmonary complications. Br J Anaesth 2017;118:317-34.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Pearse RM, Beattie S, Clavien PA, Demartines N, Fleisher LA, Grocott M, et al. Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: Prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 2016;117:601-9.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009;360:491-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Who.int.(2020)/patientsafety/safesurgery [online]. Available from: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/checklist _implementation/en/. [Last accessed on 2020 Jun 22].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Adeleye AO. The need for safety checklists in operative neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 2020;134:190-2.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
McConnell DJ, Fargen KM, Mocco J. Surgical checklists: A detailed review of their emergence, development, and relevance to neurosurgical practice. Surg Neurol Int 2012;3:2.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
8.
Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY. Surgical checklists: A systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:299-318.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Patel J, Ahmed K, Guru KA, Khan F, Marsh H, Shamim Khan M, et al. An overview of the use and implementation of checklists in surgical specialities-a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1317-23.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kamat AS, Parker A. The evolution of neurosurgery: How has our practice changed? Br J Neurosurg 2013;27:747-51.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Jelacic S, Bowdle A, Nair BG, Togashi K, Boorman DJ, Cain KC, et al. Aviation-style computerized surgical safety checklist displayed on a large screen and operated by the anesthesia provider improves checklist performance. Anesth Analg 2020;130:382-90.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mahmood T, Mylopoulos M, Bagli D, Damignani R, Aminmohamed Haji F. A mixed methods study of challenges in the implementation and use of the surgical safety checklist. Surgery 2019;165:832-7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Ong AP, Devcich DA, Hannam J, Lee T, Merry AF, Mitchell SJ. A 'paperless' wall-mounted surgical safety checklist with migrated leadership can improve compliance and team engagement. BMJ Qual Saf 2016;25:971-6.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kumar D, Gombar S, Ahuja V, Malhotra A, Gupta S. GlideScope versus D-blade for tracheal intubation in cervical spine patients: A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:544-50.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
15.
Uma B, Kochhar A. An anaesthesiologist's encounter with purple glove syndrome. Indian J Anaesth 2016;60:199-201.  Back to cited text no. 15
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
16.
Velayutham P, Cherian VT, Rajshekhar V, Babu KS. The effects of propofol and isoflurane on intraoperative motor evoked potentials during spinal cord tumour removal surgery-A prospective randomised trial. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:92-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
17.
Ali Z. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring and anaesthetic implications. Indian J Anaesth 2019;63:81-3.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Westman M, Takala R, Rahi M, Ikonen TS. The need for surgical safety checklists in neurosurgery now and in the future-a systematic review. World Neurosurg 2020;134:614-28.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Belykh E, Carotenuto A, Kalinin AA, Akshulakov SK, Kerimbayev T, Borisov VE, et al. Surgical protocol for infections, nonhealing wound prophylaxis, and analgesia: Development and implementation for posterior spinal fusions. World Neurosurg 2019;123:390-401.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Ryan SL, Sen A, Staggers K, Luerssen TG, Jea A, Texas Children's Hospital Spine Study G. A standardized protocol to reduce pediatric spine surgery infection: a quality improvement initiative. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2014;14:259-65.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Lee RP, Venable GT, Vaughn BN, Lillard JC, Oravec CS, Klimo P Jr. The impact of a pediatric shunt surgery checklist on infection rate at a single institution. Neurosurgery 2018;83:508-20.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Hommelstad J, Madso A, Eide PK. Significant reduction of shunt infection rate in children below 1 year of age after implementation of a perioperative protocol. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:523-31.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Kubilay Z, Amini S, Fauerbach LL, Archibald L, Friedman WA, Layon AJ. Decreasing ventricular infections through the use of a ventriculostomy placement bundle: experience at a single institution. J Neurosurg 2013;118:514-20.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Rahman M, Whiting JH, Fauerbach LL, Archibald L, Friedman WA. Reducing ventriculostomy-related infections to near zero: The eliminating ventriculostomy infection study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2012;38:459-64.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Ratliff J, Prasad S, Jabbour P, Evans JJ, et al. Impact of a standardized protocol and antibiotic- impregnated catheters on ventriculostomy infection rates in cerebrovascular patients. Neurosurgery 2010;67:187-91.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Lyons MK. Eight-year experience with a neurosurgical checklist. Am J Med Qual 2010;25:285-8.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Lepanluoma M, Rahi M, Takala R, Loyttyniemi E, Ikonen TS. Analysis of neurosurgical reoperations: Use of a surgical checklist and reduction of infection-related and preventable complication-related reoperations. J Neurosurg 2015;123:145-52.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Oszvald A, Vatter H, Byhahn C, Seifert V, Guresir E. “Team time-out” and surgical safety- experiences in 12,390 neurosurgical patients. Neurosurg Focus 2012;33:E6.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Fargen KM, Velat GJ, Lawson MF, Firment CS, Mocco J, Hoh BL. Enhanced staff communication and reduced near-miss errors with a neurointerventional procedural checklist. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5:497-500.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Haugen AS, Softeland E, Almeland SK, Sevdalis N, Vonen B, Eide GE, et al. Effect of the World Health Organization checklist on patient outcomes: A stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015;261:821-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1954    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded226    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal